Showing posts with label USSOCOM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USSOCOM. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2022

LTG Fenton nominated for CINC, USSOCOM

Lt. Gen. Bryan Fenton has been nominated by President Joe Biden to serve as commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin announced this month. Fenton is currently serving as commander of the Joint Special Operations Command and Joint Special Operations Command Forward at Fort Bragg.

The U.S. Special Operations Command is based at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. SOCOM is the higher command for the Air Force Special Operations Command, U.S. Army Special Operations Command, Joint Special Operations Command, Marine Forces Special Operations Command, Naval Special Warfare Command and U.S. Special Operations commands in Africa, Central, Europe, Korea, North, Pacific and South regions. Pentagon officials have not publicly announced who will replace Fenton.

Fenton’s nomination was referred to the Senate Armed Services Committee on June 6. The committee’s calendar does not list when Fenton’s confirmation will be held, as the committee has been focused on reviewing the National Defense Authorization Act this month.

Fenton, who commissioned into the Army as an infantry officer in 1987, has led the Joint Special Operations Command at Fort Bragg since July 2021. He previously served as the senior military assistant to the secretary of defense in Washington, D.C., deputy commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and commander of the Special Operations Command Pacific.

According to Fenton's biography, his past Fort Bragg assignments have included serving as a battalion commander at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School and as a brigade commander for the Joint Special Operations Command.

Operations he’s participated in during his military career include Operation Joint Force in Bosnia, Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Africa, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Odyssey Dawn in Libya.

JSOC and SOCOM

The Washington Post, New York Times and military.com have reported that the Joint Special Operations Command is responsible for the military’s special mission units such as Delta Force, the Navy Seals and the Air Force’s 24th Special Tactics Squadron. The Joint Special Operations Command falls under the U.S. Special Operations Command.

According to the SOCOM website, the Joint Special Operations Command “prepares assigned, attached and augmented forces; and when directed, conducts special operations against threats to protect the homeland and U.S. interests abroad.”

SOCOM is currently commanded by Army Gen. Richard Clarke, who leads more than 70,000 personnel. According to SOCOM, its mission is to develop special operations forces “to conduct global special operations and activities as part of the joint force to support persistent, networked and distributed combatant command operations and campaigns against state and non-state actors to protect and advance U.S. policies and objectives.” Among the jobs of its service members are civil affairs, counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, foreign humanitarian assistance, hostage rescue and recovery and unconventional warfare.

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

New USSOCOM Naval Combat Craft Assault

An UNCLASSIFIED November 23, 2020 public domain photo showing the United States Special Forces Command (USSOCOM)’s Combat Craft Assault (CCA), built by United States Marine, Inc.’s (USMI) next to the USS Hershel “Woody” Williams (ESB-4) has revealed some interesting features. The Combat Craft Assault is a cheaper version of the Combat Craft Medium (CCM). The CCA’s benefit is that it is light enough to be loaded into U.S. Air Force MC-130s and C-17s and Low-Velocity Airdropped into the sea, thus allowing U.S. naval special forces rapid insertion from anywhere in the world’s oceans.

Naval News reached out to USSOCOM and SOCOM declined any comment, only saying that all 32 CCA boats have been delivered. Nonetheless, through Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) obtained from public online UNCLASSIFIED military and industry web sources, Naval News can extrapolate and explain some of the key features of the USSOCOM Combat Craft Assault Insertion and Exfiltration speedboat.

What makes this DVIDS photo unique is the top-down perspective of the CCA, showing the CCA’s two-tone digital gray camouflage block pattern paintjob, and also the craft’s instrument panel and controls are visible since there is no roof. According to USMI, the “Deep Vee” 41-foot monohull SOCOM CCA is constructed of High-Tech composites (hence no rust streaks) and has a speed in excess of 40+ Knots. Range is unknown; however, a similar-sized boat, the 43-foot High Speed Interceptor Craft (HSIC) on USMI’s website has a range of 350 Nautical Miles.

The DVIDS photo shows the CCA’s engine is running as it is parked next to the USS Hershel “Woody” Williams Expeditionary Sea Base Four (ESB-4). The CCA’s engines power a Surface Drive System of Surface Piercing Propellers (SDS SPP). SPPs require a planning hull and according to the SDS industry, the SDS SPP has high reliability, endurance, speed, and the ability to enter shallow water. The Surface Piercing Propellers’ shapes and sizes can vary.

The non-digital uniform personnel with the Ops-Core ballistic helmets should be the U.S. Navy Sea Air Land (SEAL) Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (SWCC) Teams since they are usually the ones to operate Combat Crafts that are unique and specific to USSOCOM.

The CCA’s fold-up/fold-down composite walls are lowered to allow for boarding and off-boarding of the crew and also to prevent lateral movement of the passengers in addition to keeping away sea spray. They could be ballistically armored, although that is unconfirmed.

USNI lists some of the navigation features on the newer HSIC boat as: “Radar, GPS, Depth Finder, Magnetic Compass Flux Gate Compass, Speed Log, Autopilot, and Wind Speed (features’ models dependent on Customer Requirements)” although the HSIC’s sensors don’t mean that the older 2010-designed model CCA has all of these navigational features.



According to the U.S. Navy, VBSS Teams consist of six sailors and two alternates in each team. Typical VBSS Team armament would include a variety of carbines, handguns, shotguns, and possibly sniper rifles, lightweight to medium machine guns, and tube-launched grenade launchers for more serious threats.

The radar mast is said to have been redesigned to accommodate the new Closed Circuit Forward Looking Infrared Version 2 (CCFLIR2) turret and the maritime search radar’s saucer-shaped dish on top. It is unclear what CCFLIR version the CCA but it appears to be the two-lens gyro-stabilized CCFLIR2 ball dated to 2015 that has a Daytime color camera and an Infrared camera and a much smaller hole for a laser rangefinder/pointer. Also unclear is if USSOCOM will redesign the CCA’s mast again to accommodate the flatter CCFLIR2 turret for the Combat Craft Medium (CCM) and Combat Craft Heavy (CCH) consisting of four instead of the two lenses.



The CCA’s two Multi-function Display (MFD) terminals shows blue, green, red, and orange color outputs because “Forward Looking Infra-Red (FLIR) is essentially a thermal imager sensor that measures the ambient temperatures of objects and landscapes and creates a digital image video, enhanced with black, white, and a rainbow of colors for day/night navigation, target identification, heat source measurements, ranging, and tracking.”

The NSW’s CCA can possibly accommodate remote weapons and precision engagement missiles under the SOCOM Combat Craft Mission Equipment (CCME) program although such weapons, according to the virtual Special Operations Forces Industry Conference (SOFIC) 2020, are slated for the CCM and Combat Craft Heavy (CCH). Weapons can be placed in the forward hatch below the hull (such as the MK50 with .50cal heavy machine gun) or JQLs with JAGMs placed in the forward hatch or on the deck around the radar mast.

Article from Naval News

Thursday, November 19, 2020

Pentagon shakeup means more civilian oversight for Special Operations

More than three years after Congress mandated that the Defense Department elevate its civilian head of special operations to the same level as a military service secretary, that order has finally been carried out.

Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller on Wednesday signed a memo realigning the assistant defense secretary for special operations/low-intensity conflict to report directly to him, as the Army, Navy and Air Force secretaries currently do. “I also want to highlight that this particular change has been analyzed, debated and refined over the course of the past 30 years,” Miller said during a ceremony at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

There’s currently no confirmed official in the role. The current acting ASD SO/LIC, Ezra Cohen-Watnick also became the acting defense under secretary for intelligence on Nov. 10. Joseph Tonon is performing the duties of the principal deputy ASD SO/LIC.

Congress created the ASD/SOLIC with the 1987 National Defense Authorization Act, when it unified the services' special operations elements with their own combatant command, Special Operations Command.

But in the intervening years, officials on both the uniformed and civilian sides of the house lamented that ASD SO/LIC, which is housed within the office of the defense undersecretary for policy, didn’t have enough authority or direct communication with the defense secretary to effectively manage and advocate for special operations forces.

SOCOM, in some ways, operates as both a combatant command and its own service, but without a civilian responsible for its manning, training and equipping.

Retired Army Gen. Joseph Votel, who commanded SOCOM from August 2014 to March 2016, told Military Times in an email that Miller’s move “is probably good for SOF/SOCOM because it takes it out from under OSD-Policy and it may help with getting action on some of the more important budgetary and conceptual issues that SOCOM will be dealing with.”

That is especially important as the Pentagon’s priorities have shifted, Votel said. “As SOCOM confronts the dual challenges of continuing to keep pressure on terrorist networks and contribute to Great Power Competition it will confront decisions on maintaining legacy [counterterror] systems versus investing in areas needed for” great power competition, said Votel. “Likewise, as they look at the roles that SOF plays in the GPC — there will be undoubtedly be policy discussions” and “having senior policy oversight will be helpful with all of this.”

In a Twitter thread, Votel’s successor at SOCOM, retired Army Gen. Raymond “Tony” Thomas, called the move “both not a big deal and an ill timed, understaffed decision.” The reason, Thomas said, who commanded SOCOM from March 2016 to March 2019, is that such changes are complicated “with profound implications for DOD, ironically, demonstrated with the recent roll out of SPACECOM which is still a work in progress. Decision should not be made/implemented by a bunch of ‘acting’s‘ shooting from the hip.”

Retired Army Lt. Gen. Mike Nagata, a former commander of Special Operations Command Central who served most recently as director of the National Counterterrorism Center’s Directorate of Strategic and Operational Planning, told Military Times that the change is overdue because of how much SOCOM has grown in size and strategic importance since its inception. “An underlying problem, in my humble opinion, that needs to be addressed, is the inability of an assistant secretary of defense to discharge the larger and larger responsibility of civilian oversight of policy, advocacy and support and the service secretary-like oversight on acquisition and procurement,” Nagata, now a strategic advisor for CACI, said. “SOCOM has not remained the same organization. It has grown not just in size, but in scope of missions and political and strategic importance. SOCOM and the SOF enterprise is not like anything we have seen before and an assistant secretary can’t keep up with that change.”

The 2017 NDAA sought to remedy that by elevating the position and cutting out the bureaucracy between ASD SO/LIC and SECDEF, but it has taken years for DoD to put it into practice. “We’ve laid out many reasons for this, but essentially it comes down to this: the current structure doesn’t provide sufficient civilian oversight to SOF," retired Col. Stu Bradin, a former Special Forces officer and president of advocacy group Global SOF Foundation, told Military Times on Wednesday. "And given that the reduction in troops in Iraq and Afghanistan means that the ‘residual’ force in those places will be SOF, this is a good time to get it right.”

A senior defense official declined on Tuesday to specify which kinds of troops would stay in Afghanistan after troop levels are reduced to 2,500 next year, between the special operations counter-terrorism and conventional train-advise-assist missions they have been fulfilling.

As recently as May, former Defense Secretary Mark Esper updated lawmakers in writing on the progress of implementing the 2017 NDAA, including exploring options for creating a deputy ASD SO/LIC, and drawing up guidance for widespread distribution on ASD SO/LIC’s roles and responsibilities. “I agree that empowered civilian leadership is integral to the Department’s success, and I remain committed to institutionalizing the reforms taken under section 922,” he wrote.

Regardless of the intent or timing of the move, the bottom line is that it may not make much difference for long. While he said he welcomes the change, Nagata, the former SOCCENT commander, said it remains to be seen whether it will last in the incoming Biden administration under a new defense secretary. “It is easy to imagine people inside and outside the Pentagon not wanting this change to be durable, but want revert back to way it has been, even if does good,” he said.

Article from Military Times

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Green Beret Wife Honored With "Patriot" Award - Forms "Steel Mag" Group

A recognized and widely-esteemed leader in the Special Forces community and Executive Director of the Green Beret Foundation, Jennifer Paquette, was recently honored by the United States Special Operations Command for her tireless work in support of Special Operations Forces and more specifcally -- the Special Forces "Green Berets". Ms. Paquette received USSOCOM's "Patriot" award March 2, 2017 in Tampa, Florida. She was recognized for her service to the SOF Community that spans well over a decade.

The prestigious award, established in 2007, is the highest honor USSOCOM gives to civilians and is designed to recognize "those individuals who go above and beyond to support Special Operators and their families". Paquette has had the honor of supporting hundreds of Green Berets and their families and raised millions of dollars in support of the Green Beret Foundation - a non-profit which promises to "answer the call of Green Berets and their families so that they can succeed in their next mission".

"I recognize and am honored and humbled that I have been afforded the opportunity to support this elite unit and their families. For a female to be leading an organization that supports an all male unit, is a big deal to me. The fact that a fraternal brotherhood that has been underground for decades allows me to hold a trusted position does not go unnoticed by me. Also there would be no reason to honor me with an award if it weren't the work of the Green Berets and SOF at large," Said Paquette.

Jen has many career achievements over her 25 year career but creating the Steel Mags sorority, a program under the GBF, is one she is particularly proud of. "I have found my people-girls that are cut from the same cloth being tenacious, steadfast, loyal, dependable for the Special Forces Regiment and their families and local communities. They are just as intelligent and driven by purpose as their Green Berets. These women are my family. I may have founded the sorority but these women have built it and gave legs to the vision," Paquette says.

Paquette identified a need for this special sorority after her husband SSG (R) Roland Paquette, a Green Beret medic, was traumatically injured by an IED blast while serving with 3rd Special Forces supporting Operation Enduring Freedom. "Jen is a very tenacious, loyal and driven person. She doesn't take no for an answer and does not shy away from a challenge even when others say 'Don't do it. You will fail'. When I enlisted, she enlisted with me. We are a team." Says Roland. Roland has since successfully transitioned from military service as a combat medic to a business owner of Med Training Group and an emergency room Physician Assistant.

Realizing that US Army Special Forces have been in the longest hot war in American history, Jen knew that our Green Beret marriages were maturing and children were growing up dealing with the effects of war. Her line of thinking is if we can attempt to keep the ladies and kids supported and as healthy as possible, our Green Berets can focus on the mission at hand whether that mission is being deployed, dealing with an injury or transitioning to civilian life. "Let's share the burden," she believes.

The Steel Mags started with a small group out of Ft. Bragg, NC. They have since grown to be a national group and have been mobilized throughout the country supporting each other, their local communities and teaching even civilian young girls and ladies the philosophies of the Spartan female force of the sorority. Green Berets are particularly known for their high-deployment rates and consistent high-risk missions; they have the highest per-capita casualty rate of any unit in the US military. Given the intensity of the service and sacrifice, Jen's creation of Steel Mags appears to address an intense "need" in an empathic and vital fashion.

Uniquely positioned to understand and provide essential support to the SOF community, Paquette has a long history of service; she is on the Board of Advisors for the National Special Forces Green Beret Memorial Project near Ft. Bragg, NC. She has been active with JINSA, AIPAC, and Catholic Charities. She was selected for the 2012 Outstanding Young San Antonian award. Jen is also an Honorary Member of the Special Forces Association.

As Executive Director of the GBF, she manages critical aspects of day- to-day operations and handles strategic business development at the Foundation including strategic planning, fundraising, building and maintaining donor and investor relationships, coordination of services with USSOCOM Care Coalition, USASFC, USASOC and delivering those services to Green Berets and their families.

Green Beret Foundation Chairman of the Board Ret. Maj. Gen. Simeon Trombitas expressed enthusiasm for Jennifer's service to the Special Forces community. "Jen is an incredible asset to the Special Forces community. Her commitment has been incredible in times of great stress. Our Green Berets are much better off for having her support. Her efforts come at a critical time of need for Green Berets --- because Special Forces global deployment rates are not expected to slow down anytime soon," he said.

Ms. Paquette earned her B.S. in Business Administration majoring in Supply Chain Management from Arizona State University and her Master's in Public Administration with a concentration in Not-for-Profits and Public Policy from St. Mary's University. She is a member of Business Executives for National Security, the San Antonio Downtown Rotary Club, the San Antonio Chamber of Commerce, and an associate member to the OSS Society. "Strong Females. Strong Societies" says Paquette.

The above article came from the SF Brothers Facebook site.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

MARSOC receives new commander

The parade field on Stone Bay hosted top ranking U.S. Special Operations Command officials, Marine Raiders and their families to witness Maj. Gen. Carl E. Mundy III assume command of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command (MARSOC) on Tuesday morning. “I’m privileged to be able to be a part of this wonderful organization. Everyday that I’m in this billet ... would be a privilege to serve alongside you, and an honor to command you,” Mundy said early Tuesday.

The Change of Command ceremony was held on Stone Bay and included the passing of the Marine colors to symbolize the transfer of total responsibility, authority and accountability from the outgoing commander, Maj. Gen. Joseph L. Osterman, to Mundy. “It’s always nice rolling into the front gate and see a couple things that you remember, like the Driftwood Lounge. I don’t think that place has changed since I was a second lieutenant. It was the bane of the blotter on Monday morning,” Mundy quipped during his remarks.

Mundy served his first tour in the area 30 years prior to assuming command of MARSOC. Gen. John M. Paxton, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, was the presiding senior officer at the ceremony, representing Gen. Robert B. Neller, the commandant of the Marine Corps.

Osterman was relieved of his command effective at 9 a.m. Tuesday after two years commanding MARSOC. “The thing that has most impressed me is the caliber of the Marine, sailors, soldiers and civilians that we have here. I mean it really is extraordinary,” Osterman said after the ceremony. He will report to U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, Florida for service as its deputy commander.

Osterman will also be promoted to lieutenant general, according to ceremony officials. “I’ve had some of the most sophisticated political-military discussions of my career sitting down with a sergeant or a staff sergeant at the team level during a RAVEN exercise,” Osterman said. “That’s a great example of just the caliber, depth of intellect and professionalism that they have as individuals.”

His accomplishments include the regionalization of the three Marine Raider Battalions and their support battalions; significant expansion of MARSOC’s intelligence organization and capabilities; the development of the Special Operations Forces Liaison Element concept, which integrated planning and coordination between special operations and Marine Expeditionary Units; and much more.

“One of the big things I had to do was adjust my thought from maneuver battalions and regiments when I got here to understanding that small teams have strategic effects out in the battlespace, out globally,” Osterman said of some early challenges commanding MARSOC.

Article from JDNews

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Obama prefers Special Ops to combat forces in the war on terrorism. It's not working.

Last week the Defense Department announced a couple of significant appointments: Gen. Joseph Votel, head of Special Operations Command, or SOCOM, would become head of United States Central Command, in charge of all military operations in the Middle East. Lt. Gen. Raymond “Tony” Thomas, head of the Joint Special Operations Command (composed of the Army's Delta Force, Navy SEALs and other “Tier 1” forces) would gain an extra star and replace Votel as overall head of special operations.

Thomas thus becomes the third Joint Special Operations commander in a row to ascend to lead SOCOM and Votel becomes the latest special ops veteran elevated to a senior command, following the precedent set by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who went from Joint Special Operations Command to director of the Pentagon's Joint Staff to command in Afghanistan.

This may sound like Pentagon inside baseball, but it actually reflects an important trend: the extent to which President Obama depends on Special Operations forces, especially the joint command, which specializes in direct action missions: kicking down doors and killing or capturing terrorists. Army Special Forces, popularly known as Green Berets, by contrast, specialize in the less sexy mission of working “by, with and through” indigenous forces. No career Green Beret officer has ever been put in charge of SOCOM.

Having become president by strongly opposing the Iraq war, Obama is loath to commit ground forces to combat. But it's a different story with special operations forces. Wherever the president sees a terrorist threat, his preferred solution is to use drones or special ops troops to stage “surgical” strikes against “high-level targets.”

And how is this strategy working? Thomas told a West Point interviewer last spring that in the war on terrorism “we're losing across the board.” That's not because of any lack of valor or skill on the part of the troops Thomas commands. Special operators can eliminate individual terrorist leaders such as Osama bin Laden, but they cannot eliminate the organizations those leaders run.



Since Bin Laden's death in 2011, the terrorist threat has only gotten worse. Al Qaeda central, in Pakistan, has been weakened but its affiliates, in Yemen, Syria and elsewhere are stronger than ever. Meanwhile Islamic State has emerged from the ruins of Al Qaeda in Iraq, whose founder, Abu Musab Zarqawi, was killed by special forces in 2006. Islamic State not only administers a “caliphate” sprawling across the borders of Iraq and Syria, but it is also proliferating from Libya to Afghanistan and inspiring killers from Paris to San Bernardino.

History suggests that terrorist leaders, even ones as notorious as Bin Laden and Zarqawi, are as replaceable as most corporate CEOs. No entrenched insurgency has been defeated simply by getting rid of its chiefs. As long as the organization continues to command the loyalty of a substantial body of fighters, it will always find a substitute leader — and the new boss may turn out to be even more deadly than his predecessor.

That doesn't mean we should stop targeting terrorist leaders. Those missions can keep our enemies off balance and buy time for other efforts to succeed. The recent decision by the administration to send high-end special operators (to whom Defense Secretary Ashton Carter referred as a “specialized expeditionary targeting force”) back to Iraq was a good one.

But we also need other efforts, other lines of operation, to defeat our enemies. Alas, when it comes to the Obama administration and the war on terrorism, leadership targeting is pretty much all there is. Where is the Obama strategy to stabilize lawless lands such as Libya, Syria and Yemen, which have become a terrorist's playground? Admittedly, it is much harder to restore order out of chaos than it is to simply kill a few bad guys. But it is also necessary.

What the administration has been missing all along in the fight against Islamic extremists is a comprehensive counterinsurgency plan, one that integrates political efforts, diplomacy, information warfare, development aid and security assistance. Of these, political operations will ultimately be the decisive factor: Only if Syrian and Iraqi Sunni Muslims have a goal worth fighting for will they rise up against Islamic State. They won't fight the extremists on our behalf if the alternative is Shiite Muslim tyranny at the hands of Iranian proxies.

The best special ops forces in the world can't do it all or do it alone. The glamour of special operators, evident in movies such as “Zero Dark Thirty” and “American Sniper,” seems to have blinded Obama and a lot of other people to this important reality.

Op-Ed article by Max Boot from the Los Angeles Times

Monday, January 11, 2016

Army Special Opns Generals to Head Major Commands


It's a big week in the world of special operations: the Army's two most senior special operations officers, Gen. Joseph Votel and Lt. Gen. Raymond "Tony" Thomas (pictured at right), are the Pentagon's new picks to lead two of its most influential four-star headquarters. The moves are not yet official, but they would put Votel and Thomas in charge of U.S. Central Command and U.S. Special Operations Command respectively, both based in Tampa, Florida.

The Washington Post has profiled Votel, who will be leaving the latter command to lead the former. But Thomas, the heir apparent to SOCOM, is a more shadowy figure. Like Votel, he is a veteran of the Army's elite Ranger light infantry force. He has also held key posts in the top-secret counterterrorism unit popularly known as Delta Force.

Since last year, Thomas has headed up SOCOM's most prestigious component, the Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC, which oversees terrorist-hunting missions from North Africa to Afghanistan and beyond. As head of SOCOM, Thomas will no longer be directing the day-to-day activities of commandos and drone fleets in the field; the four-star command's role is to train and administer commando units, not employ them.

Asked to describe Thomas' personality outside the command post, one former subordinate would only say that the JSOC general is "business-oriented" and an avid hockey fan loyal to the Philadelphia Flyers. The red-faced, even-keeled officer is widely known for his candor and, by all accounts, inspires deep loyalty among his subordinates.

A 1980 graduate of West Point, Thomas completed a brief stint with a mechanized infantry unit before entering the elite Ranger battalions, where he participated in two combat parachute jumps, into Grenada in 1983 and Panama six years later, before trying out for Delta Force, the Army's super-secret counterterrorism unit. After commanding a squadron in Delta and leading Delta operators searching for war criminals in the Balkans, he returned to the Rangers as a battalion commander in time to lead the first Ranger contingent to Afghanistan three months after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. He never led an infantry battalion in the conventional Army, usually a prerequisite for Ranger command.

"He was the epitome, even as an officer, of what every young Ranger aspired to be," wrote Nate Self, a soldier who served under Thomas in Afghanistan in early 2002, in his memoir, "a no-frills operator, a former track star with strawberry-blond hair, piercing eyes, complex thoughts, and plain words." The first thing he did with new officers was take them on a five-mile run and give them assigned reading: "Gates of Fire," a novel about the famous last stand of 300 Spartan hoplites at Thermopylae, and a chapter written by a Navy SEAL colleague, William McRaven, about the 1970 Son Tay prison raid in North Vietnam.

Thomas spent much of the 12 years that followed in and out of Afghanistan and Iraq, serving as a senior JSOC staff officer and deputy commander before doing a stint as the top military liaison at the CIA. Stanley McChrystal, the retired general who was JSOC's longest-serving commander, waxed poetic in his book "My Share of the Task," gushing about Thomas' "amazing vision, unwavering loyalty, and personal courage."

The only year of the war on terror during which Thomas didn't spend time in Afghanistan was 2008, according to information Army officials shared with the press when he gained his third star last year and took command of JSOC. That was the year Thomas spent overseeing U.S. troops in Iraqi city of Mosul, where he survived a head-on attack on his armored vehicle by a car bomb.

"I loved working for him," said an Army colonel who asked not to be named because he served under Thomas in JSOC units. "When leaders say they provide top cover, some really do it and some pay lip service. Tony Thomas really does it. When I was working for him and I screwed up, what he expected me to do was come clean, tell him what I was doing about it, and he took care of the rest. That was liberating, especially in an Army that often has a zero-defects mentality."

"I think over the years he's been challenged a bit with some of his peers and superiors because of his candor and bluntness," the colonel added. McChrystal hints at that too, noting that when the two were captains together in the Rangers in the late 1980s, their "relationship was initially strained." In a 2008 blog post, former Ranger Andrew Exum, who served under Thomas in Iraq, remarked admiringly on the more senior officer's "reputation for pissing important people off."

Suggesting his candor, Thomas described some of his own frustrations as JSOC's commander in the war against the Islamic State, al-Qaida, and other extremists in a rare interview at West Point last spring. "From a leadership standpoint, if we can't explain to the nation, to subordinates, to the collective whole what we're trying to accomplish, then our strategy is by nature ill-defined and harder to achieve," the general told an interviewer from the military academy's Combating Terrorism Center -- a surprisingly harsh assessment from a serving commander, let alone the one at the helm of the shadow war.

"I'm told 'no' more than 'go' on a magnitude of about 10 to 1 on a daily basis," Thomas continued, apparently referring to missions for which JSOC sought but did not receive Pentagon approval. "I have to regulate my own frustration there to make sure it doesn't trickle down to the force."

"An Army that continues to promote this man is an Army that will win wars," predicted former Ranger Exum, who is now deputy assistant secretary of defense for Middle East policy, in his 2008 blog post. Thomas does not think the United States is beating various terrorist and insurgent foes today, however, he made clear in the West Point interview.

"We're losing across the board," he told the interviewer evenly, citing the Afghanistan-Pakistan, "ironically," as one relatively bright spot. "But across the board we're not winning."

Thomas' striking assessment - that the U.S. military is losing its wars at the same time that it is relying on special operations forces more than ever before --buttresses the argument that the commandos are a band-aid, used to patch over long-term problems with temporary fixes. This may be especially true with the "direct action" raid forces of JSOC, which draw more resources and more acclaim than Green Berets and other less classified special operators who specialize in training foreign armies.

But Thomas' promotion, if confirmed, would appear to affirm the primacy not only of special operations within the military, but of JSOC's hunter-killer units within the bigger special operations community. That trend began under the George W. Bush administration -- it was who Bush famously told the Washington Post's Bob Woodward, "JSOC is awesome" -- and has only intensified during the Obama years.

Thomas would be the third former JSOC commander in a row to head up SOCOM; the last time a career Green Beret held the post was more than 15 years ago, before the war on terror began, even though Green Berets account for by the far the plurality of SOCOM's special operators and are seeing increased use from Africa to Afghanistan as the military tries to shape the war efforts of allied militaries and irregular forces.

"Even more than other guys who've made the JSOC-to-SOCOM leap like Votel, Thomas has spent a disproportionate amount of his career in JSOC units," explained Sean Naylor, a journalist whose recent book "Relentless Strike" chronicles the hunter-killer command's rise. "If confirmed, it underlines how much senior leaders identify with the direct action side of special operations, as much lip service as they may pay to the indirect approach guys," like Green Berets. "No president has relied on JSOC as heavily as Obama has."

Article from Stripes.com

Friday, June 5, 2015

Special Ops to Obama: Let Us Fight ISIS, Already

They’re supposed to be at the forefront of the battle against ISIS. But U.S. special operators say the Obama administration’s restrictive rules of war are harming their mission. Fighting simmering frustration in their ranks over ISIS advances in Iraq and Syria, top U.S. special operations commanders say they are building forces for a multi-generational fight—not a war that will be won in the next few years.

“We recognize this is a longterm prospect,” said Gen. Joseph Votel, the overall leader of U.S. Special Operations Command, in remarks to The Daily Beast during a special operations forum in Tampa. “We’re patient.”

“We talk about it being a 15-year struggle,” added Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold, who heads the Air Force Special Operations Command, said describing the fight.

But many special operations officers and troops both in Tampa and Washington don’t want to wait that long to take the fight to ISIS. They were eager to talk about their aggravation over fighting by remote in Iraq and Syria: having to advise Iraqis, Kurdish Peshmerga, and rebel Syrian fighters from afar instead of joining them in battle.

“We are doing everything through cellphones… It’s hard to do much when you can’t go outside the wire,” said one special operator, using the military jargon for the perimeter of a base.

They blame the hands-off approach on an Obama administration unwilling to risk even small numbers of American lives in battle, burned by the fallout of the loss of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, and intent on preserving the legacy of President Barack Obama’s troop drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“You can’t say ‘We’re with you every step of the way, except when you are going on combat operations,’” said a former senior special operations official briefed on the ISIS campaign.

He and many other officers, current and former, at the conference believe both Mosul and Ramadi could have withstood the assault of the so-called Islamic State, also known as ISIS, if a small number of U.S. military advisers had been working with Iraqi forces at the front lines.

They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the debates over war strategy.

“They know as long as there are Americans with them, that if they get in trouble, there is intelligence,” and medical evacuation, the former senior official said. “They don’t have faith in their own chain of command to do it, so rather than being captured and slaughtered by ISIS, they’ll break and run.”

Another former senior special operations officer said this is the normal tension that occurs every few years between America’s political leadership that weighs the public’s reaction to U.S. casualties, and a group of professional risk-takers who want to fight alongside those they’ve trained to fight.

“It’s a generational thing,” said the officer, who said U.S. forces were similarly frustrated when training Nicaraguan forces in the 1980s. “Every few years, there is a place where the U.S. administration won’t let U.S. forces accompany those they’ve trained,” the officer said. “This younger generation has to get over it.”

U.S. Central Command’s program to train Syrian rebels—a special operations mission—has been delayed partly by congressional funding delays, and partly because it’s been difficult to find trustworthy candidates without being inside Syria, according to current and former U.S. officials involved in the process.

Votel said he hadn’t heard that vetting was a problem, nor had he heard frustrations expressed over the pace of the fight.

But faced with the necessity of having to fight by remote, the special operations commanders asked industry members present at the National Defense Industry Association conference to find new ways for the Americans to communicate remotely with foreign partners in the field—a necessity in places like Syria, where U.S. troops rely on Kurdish and other foreign partners to relay intelligence and targeting information by cellphones that can be hacked or intercepted.

The head of the Navy SEALs, Rear Adm. Brian Losey, said the nature of the fight is changing who they’re recruiting, with SEALs needing to raid one day, and work with dipomats, intelligence officers, and foreign officials the next.

“We’ve started to put more value on intellect,” Losey said, with almost half the incoming enlisted SEALs in the past two years having college degrees.

Frequently working in small, far-flung teams, “they are representing America all by themselves,” he said.

While some of the special operations commanders at the conference privately voiced concern over ISIS’s recent advances, they all said this will be a decades-long war that requires a lot more than U.S. military firepower to win.

“In this struggle, you don’t kill your way to victory,” added Heithold. “You do have to put pressure on the leadership in order to affect them. But it is not in itself the answer.”

“That’s why we talk about it being a 15-year struggle,” he said.

“We can continue to mow the grass and try to take ’em out, but it’s not a winning strategy,” added Lt. Gen. Charles Cleveland, the head of U.S. Army Special Operations Command. “We’re going to have to start thinking of root causes,” like instability or economic deprivation—something that the military can only really contribute to by training local forces, leaving the rest to other branches of government.

“We have to try to set the conditions so that 8-year-old today doesn’t become the jihadi in 10 years… or even less than that,” he said.

Article by Kimberly Dozier on the Daily Beast

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Navy SEAL Commander Advised to 'Get the Hell Out of the Media'



From the ABC News report titled: Navy SEAL Commander Advised to 'Get the Hell Out of the Media', a retired general today assailed the commander of the Navy SEAL raid that killed Osama bin Laden for drawing too much media attention to operations that he argued should be kept under wraps.

Special Operations Commander Adm. Bill McRaven was confronted by retired Lt. Gen. James Vaught, who said he didn't understand why the recent raids by the Navy SEALs, such as the one to kill Osama bin Laden or to rescue U.S. hostage Jessica Buchanan, were all over the media.

"Since the time when your wonderful team went and drug bin Laden out and got rid of him, and more recently when you went down and rescued the group in Somalia, or wherever the hell they were, they've been splashing all of this all over the media," Vaught, 85, said. "I flat don't understand that.

"Now back when my special operators extracted Saddam [Hussein] from the hole, we didn't say one damn word about it," he continued. "We turned him over to the local commander and told him to claim that his forces drug him out of the hole, and he did so. And we just faded away and kept our mouth shut.

"Now I'm going to tell you, one of these days, if you keep publishing how you do this, the other guy's going to be there ready for you, and you're going to fly in and he's going to shoot down every damn helicopter and kill every one of your SEALs. Now, watch it happen. Mark my words.

Get the hell out of the media," he concluded, as laughter broke out at a meeting of the National Defense Industrial Association in Washington, D.C.

Vaught commanded the failed mission to rescue the hostages in Iran in 1979. Eight service members died and four were injured in "Operation Eagle Claw" when the helicopters on the mission collided in the remote Iranian desert. Vaught, whose role made him the first commander of Delta Force, was not active duty during the Hussein raid, which was also conducted by the Delta Force, the secretive counterterrorism unit.

McRaven jokingly responded that he became a Navy SEAL because his sister was dating a special forces member and because he was infatuated with John Wayne's movie, "The Green Beret."

"The fact of the matter is, there have always been portrayals of SOF [Special Operations Forces] out in the mainstream media," he said. "We are in an environment today where we can't get away from it. It is not something that we actively pursue, as I think a number of the journalists here in the audience will confirm. But the fact of the matter is, with the social media being what it is today, with the press and the 24-hour news cycle, it's very difficult to get away from it."

He added that it was difficult to avoid media coverage in today's 24-hour news cycle and that it could actually help Navy SEALs do their job better.

"We have had a few failures. And I think having those failures exposed in the media also kind of helps focus our attention, helps us do a better job. So sometimes the criticism … the spotlight on us actually makes us better," McRaven said.

The Navy SEALs have received heavy media attention in the past year thanks to the bin Laden raid and the rescue in Somalia. A movie titled "Act for Valor" focusing on the elite special operations force is due for release next month and Academy Award-winning director Kathryn Bigelow is making a movie about the raid that killed the world's most wanted man.

McRaven was in Washington, D.C., today talking about an expansion in the role of special operations forces in Afghanistan. Special operations troops, McRaven said, would likely be the last to leave the country and the Pentagon is even considering a new special operations command, but that has not been decided yet.

"I have no doubt that special operations will be the last to leave Afghanistan," McRaven said. "As far as anything beyond that, we're exploring a lot of options."

Sunday, September 26, 2010

SOF Congressional Report, July 2010

U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF Background and Issues for Congress
by Andrew Feickert, Specialist in Military Ground Forces
July 9, 2010

SFA Chapter IX is posting the Summary of this report here with a link to the whole report at the bottom on this article.

Summary

Special Operations Forces (SOF) play a significant role in U.S. military operations and the Administration has given U.S. SOF greater responsibility for planning and conducting worldwide counterterrorism operations. The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) directs increases in SOF force structure, particularly in terms of increasing enabling units and rotary and fixed-wing SOF aviation assets and units.

The USSOCOM Commander, Admiral Eric T. Olson, in commenting on the current state of the forces under his command noted that SOF forces are deployed to more than 75 countries and 86% of these forces are in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. Admiral Olson also noted ongoing growth in SOF units and aviation assets and the effectiveness of Section 1208 authority, which provides funds for SOF to train and equip regular and irregular indigenous forces to conduct counterterrorism operations. USSOCOM’s FY2011 budget request for $9.8 billion has been recommended by the House and Senate Armed Services Committees for full funding, and both committees have also recommended additional funding for unfunded requirements.

Afghan-related issues include the impact of new command relationships as well as rules of engagement, which have limited SOF nighttime raids targeting insurgent leadership. These SOF raids have been characterized as being highly successful, even though on some occasions they have resulted in civilian casualties. U.S. SOF have been given the mission of training Afghan Civil Order Police, who are responsible for manning checkpoints and interacting with locals. A more controversial mission involves up to 23 Special Forces Operational Detachments – Alphas (ODAs) training local militias in remote areas of Afghanistan to fill a security void. Potential
issues for congressional consideration include how command relationships and rules of
engagement are affecting special operations in Afghanistan and whether training police and militias is the best use of U.S. SOF.

For the full report, please go to: http://www.sflistteamhouse.com/tempfiles/US_Special_Operations_Forces_-_Background-1.pdf

Saturday, February 6, 2010

USSOCOM Care Coalition - Making a Difference

United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Care Coalition’s mission is to provide SOF warriors and their families a model advocacy program in order to enhance their quality of life and strengthen the overall readiness of special operations. Central to this mission is advocacy for the SOF Wounded, Ill, and Injured Warriors, their families, and commands, not the system.

General Brown established the Care Coalition in August 2005 to track, support, and advocate for all USSOCOM casualties and to support the Component’s family programs. For the life of a SOF casualty, the USSOCOM Care Coalition advocates throughout the recovery/rehabilitation process and into their transition to civilian life.

As of January 2010, the USSOCOM Care Coalition has worked issues for three-quarters of the 3,118 SOF casualties and families, with a staff of 8 advocates, an Army Wounded Warrior Program (AW2) advocate, Veterans Affairs liaison, a Military and Family Life Consultant and a Wellness Coordinator all located at USSOCOM HQ, in addition to 15 hospital based liaisons and a staff of 5 advocates from the Care Coalition Recovery Program.

Critical to the USSOCOM Care Coalition’s success is the work accomplished by the SOF hospital liaisons located at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany; Walter Reed and Bethesda Medical Centers, both located in the National Capital Region; Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, TX; Balboa Medical Center in San Diego; James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital in Tampa, FL; other VA Medical Centers and Medical Treatment Facilities throughout the US. These SOF Non-Commissioned Officers resolve 90% of all issues.

All SOF casualties and their families, regardless of the extent of injury are provided with advocacy and information of evolving benefits and information/education related to their injury.

The USSOCOM Care Coalition works closely with Service programs (Army Wounded Warrior Program, Marine Wounded Warrior Regiment, Air Force Wounded Warrior Program, and Navy Safe Harbor) for casualties who fit their criteria of severely disabled to ensure their Service related issues are resolved.